← Lab

Rough prototype · demo data only · nothing you enter is saved

I'd use this

Benchmark Studio2026 edition

SaaS Billing & Revenue Benchmark

How B2B software companies get paid: payment success, days sales outstanding, failed payments, retention and the mix of plans and payment methods behind them.

Illustrative data. This is a demo of an interactive benchmark report, not real research. Every company and number here is made up.

Fictional companies
486
Company size range
Under 50 to 500+ staff
Where the data comes from
Generated in your browser
Explore the data

Payment success rate, every company

One dot per fictional company. Filter below and your slice lights up.

Median –Middle half –

Benchmarks are more useful when you can argue with them.

Most benchmark reports arrive as a PDF. You read the headline numbers, wonder whether companies like yours look any different, and have no way to find out.

This one is built to be explored. Slice the sample by company size, the customers you sell to, how you bill and how you get paid. Every chart, ring and sentence below recalculates for that slice. Click a bar to filter by it, open any chart as a table, and score your own numbers against your peers at the end.

The data is invented. A small generator in this page creates 486 fictional software companies with plausible, internally consistent billing metrics, and the patterns are built in on purpose so the demo has something to show. Please don't quote them.

Benchmark Studio · a Lab prototype

Slice the dataIllustrative data
486 companies

Where billing stands in this sample

Five numbers to start with. Each ring is the share of companies in the current slice. Change the slice above and watch them move.

–

say billing got better than in 2025

–

name failed card payments as a top challenge

–

take more than 45 days to get paid

–

win back more than half of failed payments

–

plan to spend on billing automation

What the slice says

–

Who is in the sample

The people answering are the ones closest to billing: finance leads, billing and revenue operations, and founders at the smaller companies. Click a size bar to filter the whole report by it.

Respondent roles

Company size by staff

Click a bar to filter

Who owns billing

What gets in the way of getting paid

Respondents picked every challenge that applies. Filter to invoice-led companies and slow collections climb; filter to monthly card billing and failed payments take over.

Top billing challenges

–

The metrics teams actually track

Share of companies in the slice that review each metric at least monthly. Payment success and retention top the list. Dunning recovery, the number behind most involuntary churn, is one of the least tracked.

What companies want to fix in 2026

Each respondent picked their top two priorities. Stopping involuntary churn and speeding up cash lead overall, and the order shifts with how a company bills.

Top two priorities for 2026

Better than last year, mostly

How billing operations compare with 2025, and where the improvement came from. Highly automated teams are the most likely to say things got much better.

Billing operations vs. 2025

Where the improvement came from

Share of all companies in the slice

Pick a metric, see the spread

Choose one of seven billing metrics. The left chart shows how the slice is spread against all companies; the right shows the middle half and median for each group. Click a group bar to filter by it.

Distribution

Share of companies in each band

By group

Each bar spans the middle half of companies in a group; the dark tick is the median.

Click a bar to filter · line marks the median for all companies

Payment success and failed payments

How many card charges succeed the first time, how many failures are won back by retries and reminders (dunning), and what is left over: customers lost to a payment that never went through.

First-attempt payment success rate

–of companies in this slice clear 94% first-attempt success.

Dunning recovery by automation level

Median share of failed payments recovered within 30 days

––

Failed payments vs. involuntary churn

Each dot is a company. The more failed payments a team wins back, the fewer customers it loses to them.

How teams see failed payments

Main way the team finds out a payment failed

–

–agree that billing performance directly affects retention

–

Days sales outstanding and old invoices

Card billing collects almost straight away. Invoices take longer, and the more revenue a company collects by invoice, the longer cash sits in receivables.

Days sales outstanding

–collect in under 30 days on average.

Share of receivables over 90 days old

–have more than 15% of receivables past 90 days, the money least likely to arrive.

Days sales outstanding vs. share of revenue collected by invoice

Each dot is a company

Net revenue retention and involuntary churn

Net revenue retention counts expansion, contraction and churn together. Involuntary churn is the slice of churn nobody chose: a customer lost because a payment failed and was never recovered.

Net revenue retention

–keep net revenue retention above 100%: they grow even with zero new customers.

Involuntary churn, monthly

Share of customers lost each month to failed payments

Monthly or annual, card or invoice

The plan and payment mix explains a lot of what sits above it. Monthly card billing fails more often but collects fast; annual invoices rarely bounce but take weeks to pay.

Plan mix by company size

Average share of customers (plans) or revenue (payment method) in each group

––

Billing model

Click a slice to filter

Main payment method

Click a slice to filter

How much of billing runs itself

Most teams have automated invoices and reminder emails. Fewer let software match payments to invoices, and chasing overdue invoices is the least automated job of all.

Billing automation maturity

Where automation is used

–

Where the 2026 budget is going

Plans split two ways: better tools, and more or better-trained people. Mostly manual teams are the keenest to change billing platform.

Planned improvements

–

Billing team and budget outlook

–

Plans for billing automation

What will move billing next

Respondents were asked what will have the biggest effect on their billing in the next two years, and how they feel about AI in billing operations.

Biggest expected effect on billing

How respondents see AI in billing

–expect AI to have a positive effect on billing operations
Reading it together

–

How would your numbers rank?

Move each slider to your own number. You're compared with the slice chosen above, so set it to companies like yours first. Nothing you enter leaves this page or is saved.

Peer group: All companies · 486 companies

Glossary

TermIn fullWhat it means here
SaaSSoftware as a serviceSoftware sold as a subscription and billed on a schedule.
Payment success rateFirst-attempt payment success rateShare of card charges that go through on the first try.
Failed paymentDeclined or failed chargeA charge the card issuer or bank turned down, often for an expired card or lack of funds.
DunningDunning and payment recoveryRetries, reminder emails and in-app prompts that try to recover a failed payment.
Dunning recoveryDunning recovery rateShare of failed payments recovered within 30 days.
Involuntary churnInvoluntary churn rateShare of customers lost in a month because a payment failed and was never recovered.
Days sales outstandingAlso called debtor daysAverage number of days between billing a customer and getting paid.
Receivables 90+Receivables over 90 daysShare of unpaid invoices that are more than 90 days past their issue date.
NRRNet revenue retentionRevenue from last year's customers this year, after upgrades, downgrades and churn, as a share of what they paid last year.
Refund rateRefunds as a share of billed revenueMoney returned to customers, including chargebacks, as a share of what was billed.
Smart retriesScheduled payment retriesRetrying a failed charge at times it is more likely to succeed instead of on a fixed schedule.
Card updaterCard account updaterA service that refreshes expired or replaced card details before the next charge.

A report you can explore instead of skim

Benchmark Studio is a Lab prototype: one template that turns survey answers and metric data into a report people can explore. This version is set up for software billing, but the structure is the same for any industry that collects benchmark data.

Everything here runs in your browser. The data is generated when the page loads, the charts redraw for each slice, and nothing you choose or enter is sent anywhere.

24Charts that redraw for each slice
4Filters, plus click-to-filter on charts
0Real companies or real survey answers

Sitting on benchmark data?

If you run an industry survey or hold anonymised metrics from your customers, this is the kind of report it could become. I'd like to hear how you share it today.

I'd use this

or write to kevin@kevinhorek.com